CNAF’s discriminatory scoring algorithm: 10 new organisations join the case before the Conseil d’État in France
Just over a year ago, 15 civil society organisations challenged the risk-scoring
algorithm used by the family branch of the French welfare system (CNAF). The
legal action was brought before the French Conseil d’État on the grounds of
personal data protection and the principle of non-discrimination. This algorithm
assigns a suspicion score to each beneficiary and selects those to subject to
further checks. Every month, the algorithm analyses the personal data of more
than 32 million people and calculates more than 13 million scores. Factors that
increase a suspicion score include having a low income, being unemployed,
receiving the minimum income benefit or disability benefits.
Today, our coalition is proud to welcome 10 new organisations in this
litigation. We are now 25 asking for a ban of the CNAF’s scoring algorithm. The
diversity of the coalition – bringing together groups of affected people, unions
as well as French and European fundamental rights NGOs – demonstrate the broad
resistance to the CNAF’s algorithm and more broadly against discriminatory
algorithms targeting vulnerable people.
Our legal action started in October 2024 before the Conseil d’État targets both
the extent of the surveillance in place and the discrimination perpetrated by
this algorithm. Fuelled by personal data of millions of people, it deliberately
targets the most disadvantaged. The serious discrimination at the heart of the
algorithm has been confirmed by the Défenseur des Droits – the French
Ombudsperson – in an opinion sent to the court in last October.
Finally, on 15 January 2026, the CNAF released the source code of its current
algorithm. While we welcome the efforts towards transparency — the CNAF had
previously refused to disclose the source code of the algorithm in use —
transparency alone is not enough. This should not distract from the fact that a
2025 internal CNAF study we obtained recognised the algorithm’s discriminatory
effects. Our coalition included this study in a new brief sent to the court in
December.
“Our new, expanded coalition brings together a variety of European and French
organisations from a range of backgrounds. This shows that the Conseil d’État
should refer the case to the Court of Justice of the European Union so that the
court can issue a pan-European decision,” says Bastien Le Querrec, legal officer
at La Quadrature du Net.
The Conseil d’État informed the plaintiffs that the written phase of the
litigation will close at the end of this month. We expect the public hearing to
take place next spring.
New plaintiffs:
* Confédération Générale du Travail (CGT)
* Union Syndicale Solidaires
* Fédération Syndicale Unitaire Travail Emploi Insertion Organismes Sociaux
(FSU TEIOS)
* Data for Good
* European Digital Rights (EDRi)
* AlgorithmWatch
* European Network Against Racism
* Panoptykon Foundation
* Mouvement des mères isolées
* Féministes contre le cyberharcèlement
First plaintiffs:
* La Quadrature du Net (LQDN)
* Association d’Accès aux Droits des Jeunes et d’Accompagnement vers la
Majorité (AADJAM)
* Aequitaz
* Amnesty International France
* Association nationale des assistant·e·s de service social (ANAS)
* APF France handicap
* Collectif Changer de Cap
* Fondation pour le Logement des Défavorisés
* Groupe d’information et de soutien des immigré·es (Gisti)
* Le Mouton numérique
* La Ligue des droits de l’Homme (LDH)
* Mouvement national des chômeurs et précaires (MNCP)
* Mouvement Français pour un Revenu de base (MFRB)
* CNDH Romeurope
* Syndicat des avocats de France (SAF)